netdev - [bpf PATCH v3 2/8] tls: remove close callback sock unlock/lock around TX work flush

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 15 Jul 2019 13:49:15 -0700
From:   John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To:     jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [bpf PATCH v3 2/8] tls: remove close callback sock unlock/lock
 around TX work flush

The tls close() callback currently drops the sock lock, makes a
cancel_delayed_work_sync() call, and then relocks the sock.

By restructuring the code we can avoid droping lock and then
reclaiming it. To simplify this we do the following,

 tls_sk_proto_close
 set_bit(CLOSING)
 set_bit(SCHEDULE)
 cancel_delay_work_sync() <- cancel workqueue
 lock_sock(sk)
 ...
 release_sock(sk)
 strp_done()

Setting the CLOSING bit prevents the SCHEDULE bit from being
cleared by any workqueue items e.g. if one happens to be
scheduled and run between when we set SCHEDULE bit and cancel
work. Then because SCHEDULE bit is set now no new work will
be scheduled.

Tested with net selftests and bpf selftests.

Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Dirk van der Merwe <dirk.vandermerwe@...ronome.com>
---
 include/net/tls.h  |    2 ++
 net/tls/tls_main.c |    3 +++
 net/tls/tls_sw.c   |   24 +++++++++++++++++-------
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/tls.h b/include/net/tls.h
index 43f551cd508b..d4276cb6de53 100644
--- a/include/net/tls.h
+++ b/include/net/tls.h
@@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ struct tls_sw_context_tx {
 	int async_capable;
 
 #define BIT_TX_SCHEDULED	0
+#define BIT_TX_CLOSING		1
 	unsigned long tx_bitmask;
 };
 
@@ -360,6 +361,7 @@ int tls_sw_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size);
 int tls_sw_sendpage(struct sock *sk, struct page *page,
 		    int offset, size_t size, int flags);
 void tls_sw_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout);
+void tls_sw_cancel_work_tx(struct tls_context *tls_ctx);
 void tls_sw_free_resources_tx(struct sock *sk);
 void tls_sw_free_resources_rx(struct sock *sk);
 void tls_sw_release_resources_rx(struct sock *sk);
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_main.c b/net/tls/tls_main.c
index 85a9d7d57b32..ddda422498aa 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_main.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_main.c
@@ -268,6 +268,9 @@ static void tls_sk_proto_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
 	void (*sk_proto_close)(struct sock *sk, long timeout);
 	bool free_ctx = false;
 
+	if (ctx->tx_conf == TLS_SW)
+		tls_sw_cancel_work_tx(ctx);
+
 	lock_sock(sk);
 	sk_proto_close = ctx->sk_proto_close;
 
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index f58a8ffc2a9c..38c0e53c727d 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -2054,6 +2054,15 @@ static void tls_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
 	}
 }
 
+void tls_sw_cancel_work_tx(struct tls_context *tls_ctx)
+{
+	struct tls_sw_context_tx *ctx = tls_sw_ctx_tx(tls_ctx);
+
+	set_bit(BIT_TX_CLOSING, &ctx->tx_bitmask);
+	set_bit(BIT_TX_SCHEDULED, &ctx->tx_bitmask);
+	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ctx->tx_work.work);
+}
+
 void tls_sw_free_resources_tx(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct tls_context *tls_ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
@@ -2065,11 +2074,6 @@ void tls_sw_free_resources_tx(struct sock *sk)
 	if (atomic_read(&ctx->encrypt_pending))
 		crypto_wait_req(-EINPROGRESS, &ctx->async_wait);
 
-	release_sock(sk);
-	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ctx->tx_work.work);
-	lock_sock(sk);
-
-	/* Tx whatever records we can transmit and abandon the rest */
 	tls_tx_records(sk, -1);
 
 	/* Free up un-sent records in tx_list. First, free
@@ -2137,11 +2141,17 @@ static void tx_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
 					       struct tx_work, work);
 	struct sock *sk = tx_work->sk;
 	struct tls_context *tls_ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
-	struct tls_sw_context_tx *ctx = tls_sw_ctx_tx(tls_ctx);
+	struct tls_sw_context_tx *ctx;
 
-	if (!test_and_clear_bit(BIT_TX_SCHEDULED, &ctx->tx_bitmask))
+	if (unlikely(!tls_ctx))
 		return;
 
+	ctx = tls_sw_ctx_tx(tls_ctx);
+	if (test_bit(BIT_TX_CLOSING, &ctx->tx_bitmask))
+		return;
+
+	if (!test_and_clear_bit(BIT_TX_SCHEDULED, &ctx->tx_bitmask))
+		return;
 	lock_sock(sk);
 	tls_tx_records(sk, -1);
 	release_sock(sk);