netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: fix perf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEf4BzbWVJcQ2pN9UwYagtBpgoL+8Q+DMwwiUt1iCMciH8YUKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Jul 2019 10:42:07 -0700
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        gor@...ux.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: fix perf_buffer on s390

On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 5:59 AM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> perf_buffer test fails for exactly the same reason test_attach_probe
> used to fail: different nanosleep syscall kprobe name.
>
> Reuse the test_attach_probe fix.
>
> Fixes: ee5cf82ce04a ("selftests/bpf: test perf buffer API")
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---

Thanks for the fix!

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>

>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c  | 12 ++----------
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c |  8 +-------
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h             |  8 ++++++++
>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
> index 47af4afc5013..5ecc267d98b0 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
> @@ -21,14 +21,6 @@ ssize_t get_base_addr() {
>         return -EINVAL;
>  }
>
> -#ifdef __x86_64__
> -#define SYS_KPROBE_NAME "__x64_sys_nanosleep"
> -#elif defined(__s390x__)
> -#define SYS_KPROBE_NAME "__s390x_sys_nanosleep"
> -#else
> -#define SYS_KPROBE_NAME "sys_nanosleep"
> -#endif
> -
>  void test_attach_probe(void)
>  {
>         const char *kprobe_name = "kprobe/sys_nanosleep";
> @@ -86,7 +78,7 @@ void test_attach_probe(void)
>
>         kprobe_link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe(kprobe_prog,
>                                                  false /* retprobe */,
> -                                                SYS_KPROBE_NAME);
> +                                                SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME);
>         if (CHECK(IS_ERR(kprobe_link), "attach_kprobe",
>                   "err %ld\n", PTR_ERR(kprobe_link))) {
>                 kprobe_link = NULL;
> @@ -94,7 +86,7 @@ void test_attach_probe(void)
>         }
>         kretprobe_link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe(kretprobe_prog,
>                                                     true /* retprobe */,
> -                                                   SYS_KPROBE_NAME);
> +                                                   SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME);
>         if (CHECK(IS_ERR(kretprobe_link), "attach_kretprobe",
>                   "err %ld\n", PTR_ERR(kretprobe_link))) {
>                 kretprobe_link = NULL;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c
> index 3f1ef95865ff..3003fddc0613 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c
> @@ -5,12 +5,6 @@
>  #include <sys/socket.h>
>  #include <test_progs.h>
>
> -#ifdef __x86_64__
> -#define SYS_KPROBE_NAME "__x64_sys_nanosleep"
> -#else
> -#define SYS_KPROBE_NAME "sys_nanosleep"
> -#endif
> -
>  static void on_sample(void *ctx, int cpu, void *data, __u32 size)
>  {
>         int cpu_data = *(int *)data, duration = 0;
> @@ -56,7 +50,7 @@ void test_perf_buffer(void)
>
>         /* attach kprobe */
>         link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe(prog, false /* retprobe */,
> -                                         SYS_KPROBE_NAME);
> +                                         SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME);
>         if (CHECK(IS_ERR(link), "attach_kprobe", "err %ld\n", PTR_ERR(link)))
>                 goto out_close;
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> index f095e1d4c657..49e0f7d85643 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> @@ -92,3 +92,11 @@ int compare_map_keys(int map1_fd, int map2_fd);
>  int compare_stack_ips(int smap_fd, int amap_fd, int stack_trace_len);
>  int extract_build_id(char *build_id, size_t size);
>  void *spin_lock_thread(void *arg);
> +
> +#ifdef __x86_64__
> +#define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "__x64_sys_nanosleep"
> +#elif defined(__s390x__)
> +#define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "__s390x_sys_nanosleep"
> +#else
> +#define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "sys_nanosleep"
> +#endif
> --
> 2.21.0
>