netdev - Re: [PATCH V35 23/29] bpf: Restrict bpf when kernel lockdown is in confidentiality mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACdnJuudpnaQ5YUhoxmxNWVdRB6v0u0Bf2O6NmYOXjp8_govyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Jul 2019 13:32:33 -0700
From:   Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chun-Yi Lee <jlee@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V35 23/29] bpf: Restrict bpf when kernel lockdown is in
 confidentiality mode

On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 3:54 PM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
> Hmm, does security_locked_down() ever return a code > 0 or why do you
> have the double check on return code? If not, then for clarity the
> ret code from security_locked_down() should be checked as 'ret < 0'
> as well and out label should be at the memset directly instead.

It doesn't, so I'll update. Thanks!