netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 13/19] ionic: Add initial ethtool support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 19 Jul 2019 04:40:13 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 13/19] ionic: Add initial ethtool support

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 05:12:07PM -0700, Shannon Nelson wrote:
> On 7/17/19 8:28 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:16:31PM -0700, Shannon Nelson wrote:
> >>On 7/8/19 7:14 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >>>>+static int ionic_set_pauseparam(struct net_device *netdev,
> >>>>+				struct ethtool_pauseparam *pause)
> >>>>+{
> >>>>+	struct lif *lif = netdev_priv(netdev);
> >>>>+	struct ionic *ionic = lif->ionic;
> >>>>+	struct ionic_dev *idev = &lif->ionic->idev;
> >>>>+
> >>>>+	u32 requested_pause;
> >>>>+	u32 cur_autoneg;
> >>>>+	int err;
> >>>>+
> >>>>+	cur_autoneg = idev->port_info->config.an_enable ? AUTONEG_ENABLE :
> >>>>+								AUTONEG_DISABLE;
> >>>>+	if (pause->autoneg != cur_autoneg) {
> >>>>+		netdev_info(netdev, "Please use 'ethtool -s ...' to change autoneg\n");
> >>>>+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >>>>+	}
> >>>>+
> >>>>+	/* change both at the same time */
> >>>>+	requested_pause = PORT_PAUSE_TYPE_LINK;
> >>>>+	if (pause->rx_pause)
> >>>>+		requested_pause |= IONIC_PAUSE_F_RX;
> >>>>+	if (pause->tx_pause)
> >>>>+		requested_pause |= IONIC_PAUSE_F_TX;
> >>>>+
> >>>>+	if (requested_pause == idev->port_info->config.pause_type)
> >>>>+		return 0;
> >>>>+
> >>>>+	idev->port_info->config.pause_type = requested_pause;
> >>>>+
> >>>>+	mutex_lock(&ionic->dev_cmd_lock);
> >>>>+	ionic_dev_cmd_port_pause(idev, requested_pause);
> >>>>+	err = ionic_dev_cmd_wait(ionic, devcmd_timeout);
> >>>>+	mutex_unlock(&ionic->dev_cmd_lock);
> >>>>+	if (err)
> >>>>+		return err;
> >>>Hi Shannon
> >>>
> >>>I've no idea what the firmware black box is doing, but this looks
> >>>wrong.
> >>>
> >>>pause->autoneg is about if the results of auto-neg should be used or
> >>>not. If false, just configure the MAC with the pause settings and you
> >>>are done. If the interface is being forced, so autoneg in general is
> >>>disabled, just configure the MAC and you are done.
> >>>
> >>>If pause->autoneg is true and the interface is using auto-neg as a
> >>>whole, you pass the pause values to the PHY for it to advertise and
> >>>trigger an auto-neg. Once autoneg has completed, and the resolved
> >>>settings are available, the MAC is configured with the resolved
> >>>values.
> >>>
> >>>Looking at this code, i don't see any difference between configuring
> >>>the MAC or configuring the PHY. I would expect pause->autoneg to be
> >>>part of requested_pause somehow, so the firmware knows what is should
> >>>do.
> >>>
> >>>	Andrew
> >>In this device there's actually very little the driver can do to directly
> >>configure the mac or phy besides passing through to the firmware what the
> >>user has requested - that happens here for the pause values, and in
> >>ionic_set_link_ksettings() for autoneg.  The firmware is managing the port
> >>based on these requests with the help of internally configured rules defined
> >>in a customer setting.
> >I get that. But the firmware needs to conform to what Linux
> >expects. And what i see here does not conform. That is why i gave a
> >bit of detail in my reply.
> >
> >What exactly does the firmware do? Once we know that, we can figure
> >out when the driver should return -EOPNOTSUPP because of firmware
> >limitations, and what it can configure and should return 0.
> 
> Because this is fairly smart FW, it handles this as expected.  I can add
> this as another comment in the code.

Hi Shannon

Looking at the code, i don't see how it can handle this
correctly. Please look at my comments, particularly the meaning of
pause->autoneg and describe how the firmware does the right thing,
given what information it is passed.

       Andrew