[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN8PR12MB3266678A3ABD0EBF429C9766D3C40@BN8PR12MB3266.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:58:20 +0000
From: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
CC: Ondřej Jirman <megi@....cz>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: stmmac: Convert to phylink
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Date: Jul/22/2019, 14:40:23 (UTC+00:00)
> Does this mean that all stmmac variants support 1G? There are none
> which just support Fast Ethernet?
This glue logic drivers sometimes reflect a custom IP that's Synopsys
based but modified by customer, so I can't know before-hand what's the
supported max speed. There are some old versions that don't support 1G
but I expect that PHY driver limits this ...
> I'm also not sure the change fits the problem. Why did it not
> negotiate 100FULL rather than 10Half? You are only moving the 1G
> speeds around, so 100 speeds should of been advertised and selected.
Hmm, now that I'm looking at it closer I agree with you. Maybe link
partner or PHY doesn't support 100M ?
It's working for Ondrej but I got curious now ...
---
Thanks,
Jose Miguel Abreu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists