netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: stmmac: Introducing support for Page Pool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:38:33 +0100
From:   Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To:     Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>, Lars Persson <lists@...h.nu>,
        Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
CC:     Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com" 
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: stmmac: Introducing support for Page
 Pool


On 23/07/2019 11:07, Jose Abreu wrote:
> From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
> Date: Jul/23/2019, 11:01:24 (UTC+00:00)
> 
>> This appears to be a winner and by disabling the SMMU for the ethernet
>> controller and reverting commit 954a03be033c7cef80ddc232e7cbdb17df735663
>> this worked! So yes appears to be related to the SMMU being enabled. We
>> had to enable the SMMU for ethernet recently due to commit
>> 954a03be033c7cef80ddc232e7cbdb17df735663.
> 
> Finally :)
> 
> However, from "git show 954a03be033c7cef80ddc232e7cbdb17df735663":
> 
> +         There are few reasons to allow unmatched stream bypass, and
> +         even fewer good ones.  If saying YES here breaks your board
> +         you should work on fixing your board.
> 
> So, how can we fix this ? Is your ethernet DT node marked as 
> "dma-coherent;" ?

TBH I have no idea. I can't say I fully understand your change or how it
is breaking things for us.

Currently, the Tegra DT binding does not have 'dma-coherent' set. I see
this is optional, but I am not sure how you determine whether or not
this should be set.

Jon

-- 
nvpublic