[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <535ebf16-c523-0799-3ffe-6cfbeee3ac57@mellanox.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:21:45 +0000
From: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...lanox.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"xdp-newbies@...r.kernel.org" <xdp-newbies@...r.kernel.org>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [net-next] net/mlx5e: xsk: dynamically allocate
mlx5e_channel_param
On 2019-07-08 18:16, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
> On 2019-07-08 15:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> - mlx5e_build_xsk_cparam(priv, params, xsk, &cparam);
>> + cparam = kzalloc(sizeof(*cparam), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Similar code in mlx5e_open_channels (en_main.c) uses kvzalloc. Although
> the struct is currently smaller than a page anyway, and there should be
> no difference in behavior now, I suggest using the same alloc function
> to keep code uniform.
>
>> /* Create a dedicated SQ for posting NOPs whenever we need an IRQ to be
>> * triggered and NAPI to be called on the correct CPU.
>> */
>> - err = mlx5e_open_icosq(c, params, &cparam.icosq, &c->xskicosq);
>> + err = mlx5e_open_icosq(c, params, &cparam->icosq, &c->xskicosq);
>> if (unlikely(err))
>> goto err_close_icocq;
>>
>
> Here is kfree missing. It's a memory leak in the good path.
Arnd, I'm going to take over your patch and respin it, addressing my own
comments, because it's been quite a while, and we want to have this fix.
Thanks for spotting it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists