lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 23 Jul 2019 10:14:14 -0500
From:   Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To:     <wg@...ndegger.com>, <mkl@...gutronix.de>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/5] can: m_can: Create a m_can platform framework

Hello

On 7/10/19 7:08 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Hello
>
> On 6/17/19 10:09 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>> Marc
>>
>> On 6/10/19 11:35 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>> Bump
>>>
>>> On 6/6/19 8:16 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>>> Marc
>>>>
>>>> Bump
>>>>
>>>> On 5/31/19 6:51 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>>>> Marc
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/15/19 3:54 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>>>>> Marc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/9/19 11:11 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>>>>>> Create a m_can platform framework that peripheral
>>>>>>> devices can register to and use common code and register sets.
>>>>>>> The peripheral devices may provide read/write and configuration
>>>>>>> support of the IP.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> v12 - Update the m_can_read/write functions to create a 
>>>>>>> backtrace if the callback
>>>>>>> pointer is NULL. - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1052302/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this able to be merged now?
>>>>>
>>>>> ping
>>
>> Wondering if there is anything else we need to do?
>>
>> The part has officially shipped and we had hoped to have driver 
>> support in Linux as part of the announcement.
>>
> Is this being sent in a PR for 5.3?
>
> Dan
>
Adding Greg to this thread as I have no idea what is going on with 
this.  This patch set has missed 2 merge windows and has

been ready since May.  Our customers are requesting status but we can 
only point to the mail thread

Here is the reference of the pinging I have done without reply

https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1071894/

Dan


>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ