netdev - Re: [net-next:master 13/14] drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c:777:13: error: 'skb_frag_t {aka struct bio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190723.115006.370638410899452293.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     willy@...radead.org
Cc:     opensource@...rst.com, kbuild-all@...org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next:master 13/14]
 drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c:777:13: error: 'skb_frag_t {aka
 struct bio_vec}' has no member named 'size'

From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 04:52:38 -0700

> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 08:58:44AM +0000, René van Dorst wrote:
>> Hi Matthew,
>> 
>> I see the same issue for the mediatek/mtk_eth_soc driver.
> 
> Thanks, Rene.  The root problem for both of these drivers is that neither
> are built on x86 with CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST.  Is it possible to fix this?
> 
> An untested patch to fix both of these problems (and two more that I
> spotted):

I took care of the ftgmac100 case in the net-next tree, sorry I didn't see
this first...