netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] dpaa2-eth: Don't use netif_receive_skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190723.140255.1785812525450069326.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 23 Jul 2019 14:02:55 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     ruxandra.radulescu@....com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, ioana.ciornei@....com,
        vladimir.oltean@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] dpaa2-eth: Don't use netif_receive_skb_list
 for TCP frames

From: Ioana Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@....com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 20:28:43 +0300

> Using Rx skb bulking for all frames may negatively impact the
> performance in some TCP termination scenarios, as it effectively
> bypasses GRO.

"may"?

Please provide numbers so that we know exactly whether it actually
hurts performance one way or another.

Thank you.