[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0c405a3a694bb8f40ef1df7087a220ee01442037.camel@mellanox.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 22:51:42 +0000
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To: "snelson@...sando.io" <snelson@...sando.io>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 11/19] ionic: Add Rx filter and rx_mode ndo
support
On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 14:33 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>
> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:40:15 -0700
>
> > + if (in_interrupt()) {
> > + work = kzalloc(sizeof(*work), GFP_ATOMIC);
> > + if (!work) {
> > + netdev_err(lif->netdev, "%s OOM\n", __func__);
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > + work->type = add ? DW_TYPE_RX_ADDR_ADD :
> > DW_TYPE_RX_ADDR_DEL;
> > + memcpy(work->addr, addr, ETH_ALEN);
> > + netdev_dbg(lif->netdev, "deferred: rx_filter %s %pM\n",
> > + add ? "add" : "del", addr);
> > + ionic_lif_deferred_enqueue(&lif->deferred, work);
> > + } else {
> > + netdev_dbg(lif->netdev, "rx_filter %s %pM\n",
> > + add ? "add" : "del", addr);
> > + if (add)
> > + return ionic_lif_addr_add(lif, addr);
> > + else
> > + return ionic_lif_addr_del(lif, addr);
> > + }
>
> I don't know about this.
>
> Generally interface address changes are expected to be synchronous.
Well, drivers can't sleep on set_rx_mode ndo, dev_set_rx_mode is
holding netif_addr_lock_bh.
Some drivers need to wait for firmware/device completion to program the
new address and they have to do this asynchronously to avoid atomic
context. I assume this driver is having the same issue due to
"ionic_adminq_post_wait()" ..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists