netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 11/19] ionic: Add Rx filter and rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190723.160628.20093803405793483.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 23 Jul 2019 16:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     snelson@...sando.io
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 11/19] ionic: Add Rx filter and rx_mode ndo
 support

From: Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:50:43 -0700

> On 7/23/19 2:33 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> Generally interface address changes are expected to be synchronous.
> Yeah, this bothers me a bit as well, but the address change calls come
> in under spin_lock_bh(), and I'm reluctant to make an AdminQ call
> under the _bh that could block for a few seconds.

So it's not about memory allocation but rather the fact that the device
might take a while to complete?

Can you start the operation synchronously yet complete it async?