netdev - Re: pull-request: can-next 2019-07-24

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7939ec79-a54b-fc7c-1e75-a9f5c8a5c19b@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:26:08 +0200
From:   Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:     Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        linux-can@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull-request: can-next 2019-07-24

On 7/24/19 11:22 AM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> why didn't you include the CAN FD support for the can-gw?

I wanted to have a look at the patches. But the other patches are
already reviewed.

I'll do another pull-request this week.

> [PATCH 1/2] can: gw: use struct canfd_frame as internal data structure
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-can&m=156388681922741&w=2
> 
> [PATCH 2/2] can: gw: add support for CAN FD frames
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-can&m=156388682022742&w=2
> 
> The patches have already been sent in January as RFC and I did extensive 
> testing since then.

Good.

regards,
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)