netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/8] Use dev_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     hslester96@...il.com
Cc:     klassert@...nel.org, jcliburn@...il.com, chris.snook@...il.com,
        rmody@...vell.com, michael.chan@...adcom.com,
        siva.kallam@...adcom.com, prashant@...adcom.com,
        GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
        cooldavid@...ldavid.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/8] Use dev_get_drvdata where possible

From: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:05:12 +0800

> These patches use dev_get_drvdata instead of
> using to_pci_dev + pci_get_drvdata to make
> code simpler where possible.
> 
> Changelog:
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> - Change pci_set_drvdata to dev_set_drvdata
>   to keep consistency.

Some of these patches were applied yesterday, weren't they?

Please take that into consideration when you repost, especially
when the maintainer(s) explicitly reply to your patches saying
"Applied." or similar like I always do.

Thanks.