[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8134ff55ff4b2c190adc48503dafdfde018fc84d.camel@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 13:52:16 -0700
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: kai.heng.feng@...onical.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com, aaron.f.brown@...el.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 6/6] e1000e: disable force K1-off feature
On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 14:04 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 10:36:50 -0700
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/hw.h
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/hw.h
> > index eff75bd8a8f0..e3c71fd093ee 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/hw.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/hw.h
> > @@ -662,6 +662,7 @@ struct e1000_dev_spec_ich8lan {
> > bool kmrn_lock_loss_workaround_enabled;
> > struct e1000_shadow_ram
> > shadow_ram[E1000_ICH8_SHADOW_RAM_WORDS];
> > bool nvm_k1_enabled;
> > + bool disable_k1_off;
> > bool eee_disable;
>
> I don't see any code actually setting this boolean, how does it work?
So either this patch is missing a bit of code OR this is not needed for
the Linux driver. Either way this patch needs changes or needs to be
dropped, so I am dropping this patch from the series until I get
further information from the client driver team.
I will be re-submitting this series, minus this patch.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists