[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <327e1905-30e3-6dea-f3f1-71dc73478e0b@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 10:04:46 +0800
From: tanhuazhong <tanhuazhong@...wei.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "lipeng321@...wei.com" <lipeng321@...wei.com>,
"yisen.zhuang@...wei.com" <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>,
"salil.mehta@...wei.com" <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
"linuxarm@...wei.com" <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"liuyonglong@...wei.com" <liuyonglong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/11] net: hns3: fix mis-counting IRQ vector
numbers issue
On 2019/7/25 2:28, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 11:18 +0800, Huazhong Tan wrote:
>> From: Yonglong Liu <liuyonglong@...wei.com>
>>
>> The num_msi_left means the vector numbers of NIC, but if the
>> PF supported RoCE, it contains the vector numbers of NIC and
>> RoCE(Not expected).
>>
>> This may cause interrupts lost in some case, because of the
>> NIC module used the vector resources which belongs to RoCE.
>>
>> This patch corrects the value of num_msi_left to be equals to
>> the vector numbers of NIC, and adjust the default tqp numbers
>> according to the value of num_msi_left.
>>
>> Fixes: 46a3df9f9718 ("net: hns3: Add HNS3 Acceleration Engine &
>> Compatibility Layer Support")
>> Signed-off-by: Yonglong Liu <liuyonglong@...wei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Peng Li <lipeng321@...wei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Huazhong Tan <tanhuazhong@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_main.c | 5 ++++-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3vf/hclgevf_main.c | 12
>> ++++++++++--
>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_main.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_main.c
>> index 3c64d70..a59d13f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_main.c
>> @@ -1470,13 +1470,16 @@ static int hclge_vport_setup(struct
>> hclge_vport *vport, u16 num_tqps)
>> {
>> struct hnae3_handle *nic = &vport->nic;
>> struct hclge_dev *hdev = vport->back;
>> + u16 alloc_tqps;
>> int ret;
>>
>> nic->pdev = hdev->pdev;
>> nic->ae_algo = &ae_algo;
>> nic->numa_node_mask = hdev->numa_node_mask;
>>
>> - ret = hclge_knic_setup(vport, num_tqps,
>> + alloc_tqps = min_t(u16, hdev->roce_base_msix_offset - 1,
>
>
> Why do you need the extra alloc_tqps ? just overwrite num_tqps, the
> original value is not needed afterwards.
>
Yes, using num_tqps is better.
I will remove the extra alloc_tqps in V2.
Thanks.
>> num_tqps);
>> +
>> + ret = hclge_knic_setup(vport, alloc_tqps,
>> hdev->num_tx_desc, hdev->num_rx_desc);
>> if (ret)
>> dev_err(&hdev->pdev->dev, "knic setup failed %d\n",
>> ret);
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists