lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 25 Jul 2019 11:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     navid.emamdoost@...il.com
Cc:     emamd001@....edu, kjlu@....edu, smccaman@....edu,
        secalert@...hat.com, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
        alexandre.torgue@...com, joabreu@...opsys.com,
        mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] stmmac_dt_phy: null check the allocation

From: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 17:28:09 -0500

> @@ -342,10 +342,13 @@ static int stmmac_dt_phy(struct plat_stmmacenet_data *plat,
>  		mdio = true;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (mdio)
> +	if (mdio) {
>  		plat->mdio_bus_data =
>  			devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct stmmac_mdio_bus_data),
>  				     GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!plat->mdio_bus_data)
> +			return -ENOMEM;

This leaks a reference to plat->mdio_node() which is acquired in the
for_each_child_of_node() loop right before the context here.

This is what I really fear about these automated patches, it is quite
often the case that acquired resources are subtly acquired in nearby
code and not released by the proposed "fix".

Therefore, either we end up with a regression, or as is the case here
a reviewer invests more time into double checking your patch than you
put into writing the patch in the first place.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ