[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190725072406.GA3235@kwain>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 09:24:06 +0200
From: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: antoine.tenart@...tlin.com, richardcochran@...il.com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
ralf@...ux-mips.org, paul.burton@...s.com, jhogan@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, allan.nielsen@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 8/8] net: mscc: PTP Hardware Clock (PHC)
support
Hi David,
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:52:26AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>
> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:17:15 +0200
>
> > +static int ocelot_ptp_adjfine(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, long scaled_ppm)
> > +{
> > + struct ocelot *ocelot = container_of(ptp, struct ocelot, ptp_info);
> > + u32 unit = 0, direction = 0;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> ^^^^
> > + u64 adj = 0;
> > +
> > + if (!scaled_ppm)
> > + goto disable_adj;
> ...
> > +disable_adj:
> > + ocelot_write(ocelot, 0, PTP_CLK_CFG_ADJ_CFG);
> > +
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ocelot->ptp_clock_lock, flags);
> ^^^^^
> Did GCC really not warn about this in your build like it did immediately
> on mine?
I was using gcc8 for mips32, and it did not warn about this. Sorry about
that.
> drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.c: In function ‘ocelot_ptp_adjfine’:
> ./include/linux/spinlock.h:288:3: warning: ‘flags’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags); \
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Please fix this and when you respin please just elide the MIPS tree
> patches and just keep all the ones that I should apply to net-next.
OK, will do.
Thanks!
Antoine
--
Antoine Ténart, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists