netdev - [PATCH bpf] libbpf: fix erroneous multi-closing of BTF FD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190726212438.1269599-1-andriin@fb.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Jul 2019 14:24:38 -0700
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
To:     <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <ast@...com>,
        <daniel@...earbox.net>, <rdna@...com>, <yhs@...com>
CC:     <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>, <kernel-team@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf] libbpf: fix erroneous multi-closing of BTF FD

Libbpf stores associated BTF FD per each instance of bpf_program. When
program is unloaded, that FD is closed. This is wrong, because leads to
a race and possibly closing of unrelated files, if application
simultaneously opens new files while bpf_programs are unloaded.

It's also unnecessary, because struct btf "owns" that FD, and
btf__free(), called from bpf_object__close() will close it. Thus the fix
is to never have per-program BTF FD and fetch it from obj->btf, when
necessary.

Fixes: 2993e0515bb4 ("tools/bpf: add support to read .BTF.ext sections")
Reported-by: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 11 +++--------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 8741c39adb1c..44a428378d48 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -181,7 +181,6 @@ struct bpf_program {
 	bpf_program_clear_priv_t clear_priv;
 
 	enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
-	int btf_fd;
 	void *func_info;
 	__u32 func_info_rec_size;
 	__u32 func_info_cnt;
@@ -312,7 +311,6 @@ void bpf_program__unload(struct bpf_program *prog)
 	prog->instances.nr = -1;
 	zfree(&prog->instances.fds);
 
-	zclose(prog->btf_fd);
 	zfree(&prog->func_info);
 	zfree(&prog->line_info);
 }
@@ -391,7 +389,6 @@ bpf_program__init(void *data, size_t size, char *section_name, int idx,
 	prog->instances.fds = NULL;
 	prog->instances.nr = -1;
 	prog->type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC;
-	prog->btf_fd = -1;
 
 	return 0;
 errout:
@@ -2283,9 +2280,6 @@ bpf_program_reloc_btf_ext(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_object *obj,
 		prog->line_info_rec_size = btf_ext__line_info_rec_size(obj->btf_ext);
 	}
 
-	if (!insn_offset)
-		prog->btf_fd = btf__fd(obj->btf);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -2458,7 +2452,7 @@ load_program(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_insn *insns, int insns_cnt,
 	char *cp, errmsg[STRERR_BUFSIZE];
 	int log_buf_size = BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE;
 	char *log_buf;
-	int ret;
+	int btf_fd, ret;
 
 	if (!insns || !insns_cnt)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -2473,7 +2467,8 @@ load_program(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_insn *insns, int insns_cnt,
 	load_attr.license = license;
 	load_attr.kern_version = kern_version;
 	load_attr.prog_ifindex = prog->prog_ifindex;
-	load_attr.prog_btf_fd = prog->btf_fd >= 0 ? prog->btf_fd : 0;
+	btf_fd = bpf_object__btf_fd(prog->obj);
+	load_attr.prog_btf_fd = btf_fd >= 0 ? btf_fd : 0;
 	load_attr.func_info = prog->func_info;
 	load_attr.func_info_rec_size = prog->func_info_rec_size;
 	load_attr.func_info_cnt = prog->func_info_cnt;
-- 
2.17.1