lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <256df7f47312f676f9644f59be8e3b3e2b99da28.camel@mellanox.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Jul 2019 21:41:17 +0000
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To:     "jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com" <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
CC:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [net 7/9] net/mlx5e: kTLS, Call WARN_ONCE on netdev mismatch

On Thu, 2019-07-25 at 13:49 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 20:36:48 +0000, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
> > 
> > A netdev mismatch in the processed TLS SKB should not occur,
> > and indicates a kernel bug.
> > Add WARN_ONCE to spot such cases.
> > 
> > Fixes: d2ead1f360e8 ("net/mlx5e: Add kTLS TX HW offload support")
> > Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ktls_tx.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git
> > a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ktls_tx.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ktls_tx.c
> > index ea032f54197e..3766545ce259 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ktls_tx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ktls_tx.c
> > @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ struct sk_buff *mlx5e_ktls_handle_tx_skb(struct
> > net_device *netdev,
> >  		goto out;
> >  
> >  	tls_ctx = tls_get_ctx(skb->sk);
> > -	if (unlikely(tls_ctx->netdev != netdev))
> > +	if (unlikely(WARN_ON_ONCE(tls_ctx->netdev != netdev)))
> 
> Ah, nit: the unlikely is probably unnecessary but that's no big deal.
> 
> #define WARN_ON_ONCE(condition) ({			\
> 	static int __warned;				\
> 	int __ret_warn_once = !!(condition);		\
> 							\
> 	if (unlikely(__ret_warn_once && !__warned)) {	\
> 		__warned = true;			\
> 		WARN_ON(1);				\
> 	}						\
> 	unlikely(__ret_warn_once);			\
> })
> 

indeed, i see Dave already accepted this, will fix in net-next.

Thanks Jakub !

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ