lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 26 Jul 2019 16:29:02 -0700
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 06/10] selftests/bpf: add CO-RE relocs array tests

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 4:26 PM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:27:38PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > Add tests for various array handling/relocation scenarios.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
> ...
> > +
> > +#define CORE_READ(dst, src) \
> > +     bpf_probe_read(dst, sizeof(*src), __builtin_preserve_access_index(src))
>
> This is the key accessor that all progs will use.
> Please split just this single macro into individual commit and add
> detailed comment about its purpose and
> what __builtin_preserve_access_index() does underneath.

I'm planning to add more powerful and flexible set of macros to
support BCC style a->b->c->d accesses using single macro. Something
like BPF_CORE_READ(&dst, sizeof(dst), a, b, c, d). I want to move
bpf_helpers.h into libbpf itself first, after some clean up. How about
I write all that at that time and for now just add this simpler
CORE_READ into bpf_helpers.h?

Relocations recorded by __builtin_preserve_access_index() are
described pretty well in patch #1, which adds bpf_offset_reloc. I'll
double check if I mention this built-in there, and if not - will add
that.

>
> > +SEC("raw_tracepoint/sys_enter")
> > +int test_core_nesting(void *ctx)
> > +{
> > +     struct core_reloc_arrays *in = (void *)&data.in;
> > +     struct core_reloc_arrays_output *out = (void *)&data.out;
> > +
> > +     /* in->a[2] */
> > +     if (CORE_READ(&out->a2, &in->a[2]))
> > +             return 1;
> > +     /* in->b[1][2][3] */
> > +     if (CORE_READ(&out->b123, &in->b[1][2][3]))
> > +             return 1;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ