lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUU1Hi+OGhniw_cyG2xF29Xkqc-Rp-OoJixQFtGyE9=01A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:08:35 +0200
From:   Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        clement.perrochaud@...innov.com, charles.gorand@...innov.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...dativ.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/14] NFC: nxp-nci: Remove unused macro pr_fmt()

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 4:58 PM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 12:38 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 02:23:46PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > > Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 22:35:08 +0300
> > >
> > > > The macro had never been used.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > > > Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
> > >  ...
> > > > @@ -12,8 +12,6 @@
> > > >   * Copyright (C) 2012  Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
> > > >   */
> > > >
> > > > -#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> > >
> > > If there are any kernel log messages generated, which is the case in
> > > this file, this is used.
> >
> > AFAICS no, it's not.
> > All nfc_*() macros are built on top of dev_*() ones for which pr_fmt() is no-op.
> > If we would like to have it in that way, we rather should use dev_fmt().
> >
> >
> > > Also, please resubmit this series with a proper header posting containing
> > > a high level description of what this patch series does, how it is doing it,
> > > and why it is doing it that way.  Also include a changelog.
> >
> > Will do.
> >
> > Thank you for review!
> >
>
> Can you send out the latest series as v5?
> I got some new? patches from you, but a bit confused now.
>

Thanks for the cover-letter.

- Sedat -

[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=156440732411578&w=2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ