netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add support to setup led-control register through device-tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 30 Jul 2019 17:50:32 +0200
From:   Hubert Feurstein <h.feurstein@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add support to setup led-control
 register through device-tree

Am Di., 30. Juli 2019 um 16:09 Uhr schrieb Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>:
[...]
> Sorry, but this is not going to be accepted. There is an ongoing
> discussion about PHY LEDs and how they should be configured. Switch
> LEDs are no different from PHY LEDs. So they should use the same basic
> concept.
>
> Please take a look at the discussion around:
>
> [RFC] dt-bindings: net: phy: Add subnode for LED configuration
>
> Marvell designers have made this more difficult than it should be by
> moving the registers out of the PHY address space and into the switch
> address space. So we are going to have to implement this code twice
> :-(
Ok, good to know. I'll wait for the first implementation and take it
as a reference.

Hubert