[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eb027202-2a70-12eb-1544-7ddfd137aabb@solarflare.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 23:20:58 +0100
From: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
To: <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 1/3] sfc: don't score irq moderation points
for GRO
We already scored points when handling the RX event, no-one else does this,
and looking at the history it appears this was originally meant to only
score on merges, not on GRO_NORMAL. Moreover, it gets in the way of
changing GRO to not immediately pass GRO_NORMAL skbs to the stack.
Performance testing with four TCP streams received on a single CPU (where
throughput was line rate of 9.4Gbps in all tests) showed a 13.7% reduction
in RX CPU usage (n=6, p=0.03).
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c
index d5db045535d3..85ec07f5a674 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c
@@ -412,7 +412,6 @@ efx_rx_packet_gro(struct efx_channel *channel, struct efx_rx_buffer *rx_buf,
unsigned int n_frags, u8 *eh)
{
struct napi_struct *napi = &channel->napi_str;
- gro_result_t gro_result;
struct efx_nic *efx = channel->efx;
struct sk_buff *skb;
@@ -449,9 +448,7 @@ efx_rx_packet_gro(struct efx_channel *channel, struct efx_rx_buffer *rx_buf,
skb_record_rx_queue(skb, channel->rx_queue.core_index);
- gro_result = napi_gro_frags(napi);
- if (gro_result != GRO_DROP)
- channel->irq_mod_score += 2;
+ napi_gro_frags(napi);
}
/* Allocate and construct an SKB around page fragments */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists