[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190730160502.699d0b9a@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 16:05:02 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: Takshak Chahande <ctakshak@...com>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>,
<rdna@...com>, <kernel-team@...com>, <hechaol@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf : make libbpf_num_possible_cpus
function thread safe
On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 15:24:47 -0700, Takshak Chahande wrote:
> Having static variable `cpus` in libbpf_num_possible_cpus function without
> guarding it with mutex makes this function thread-unsafe.
>
> If multiple threads accessing this function, in the current form; it
> leads to incrementing the static variable value `cpus` in the multiple
> of total available CPUs.
>
> Let caching the number of possile CPUs handled by libbpf's users than
> this library itself;
Can we just use stack variable for the calculations and
READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() for assignment to the static?
libbpf itself uses this helper so caller caching wouldn't
work there.
> and let this function be rock bottom one which reads
> and parse the file (/sys/devices/system/cpu/possible) everytime it gets
> called to simplify the things.
I don't understand can you rephrase?
> Fixes: 6446b3155521 (bpf: add a new API libbpf_num_possible_cpus())
>
No new line after the fixes tag, also I think you're missing quotation
marks around the commit title?
> Signed-off-by: Takshak Chahande <ctakshak@...com>
> Acked-by: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists