[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190731153640-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:37:34 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/9] vhost: reset invalidate_count in
vhost_set_vring_num_addr()
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 04:32:52PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 09:29:28PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> > On 2019/7/31 下午8:41, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 04:46:50AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > The vhost_set_vring_num_addr() could be called in the middle of
> > > > invalidate_range_start() and invalidate_range_end(). If we don't reset
> > > > invalidate_count after the un-registering of MMU notifier, the
> > > > invalidate_cont will run out of sync (e.g never reach zero). This will
> > > > in fact disable the fast accessor path. Fixing by reset the count to
> > > > zero.
> > > >
> > > > Reported-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> > > Did Michael report this as well?
> >
> >
> > Correct me if I was wrong. I think it's point 4 described in
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/21/25.
>
> I'm not sure what that is talking about
>
> But this fixes what I described:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/22/554
>
> Jason
These are two reasons for a possible counter imbalance.
Unsurprisingly they are both fixed if you reset the counter to 0.
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists