lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190731194502.GC2324@nanopsycho>
Date:   Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:45:02 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        sthemmin@...rosoft.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 1/3] net: devlink: allow to change namespaces

Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 09:41:10PM CEST, dsahern@...il.com wrote:
>On 7/31/19 1:26 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:39:52AM CEST, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com wrote:
>>> On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:57:32 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>>>>
>>>> All devlink instances are created in init_net and stay there for a
>>>> lifetime. Allow user to be able to move devlink instances into
>>>> namespaces.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>>>
>>> I'm no namespace expert, but seems reasonable, so FWIW:
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
>>>
>>> If I read things right we will only send the devlink instance
>>> notification to other namespaces when it moves, but not
>>> notifications for sub-objects like ports. Is the expectation 
>>> that the user space dumps the objects it cares about or will
>>> the other notifications be added as needed (or option 3 - I 
>>> misread the code).
>> 
>> You are correct. I plan to take care of the notifications of all objects
>> in the follow-up patchset. But I can do it in this one if needed. Up to
>> you.
>> 
>
>seems like it should be a part of this one. If a devlink instance
>changes namespaces, all of its associated resources should as well.

Okay. Will do.


>
>Also, seems like you are missing a 'can this devlink instance be moved'

I don't see why not.


>check. e.g., what happens if a resource controller has been configured
>for the devlink instance and it is moved to a namespace whose existing
>config exceeds those limits?

It's moved with all the values. The whole instance is moved.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ