lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190731225303.GC1330@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 31 Jul 2019 23:53:04 +0100
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     soc@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
        Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@...il.com>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] ARM: move lpc32xx and dove to multiplatform

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 09:56:42PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> For dove, the patches are basically what I had proposed back in
> 2015 when all other ARMv6/ARMv7 machines became part of a single
> kernel build. I don't know what the state is mach-dove support is,
> compared to the DT based support in mach-mvebu for the same
> hardware. If they are functionally the same, we could also just
> remove mach-dove rather than applying my patches.

Well, the good news is that I'm down to a small board support file
for the Dove Cubox now - but the bad news is, that there's still a
board support file necessary to support everything the Dove SoC has
to offer.

Even for a DT based Dove Cubox, I'm still using mach-dove, but it
may be possible to drop most of mach-dove now.  Without spending a
lot of time digging through it, it's impossible to really know.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ