lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190802110023.udfcxowe3vmihduq@salvia>
Date:   Fri, 2 Aug 2019 13:00:23 +0200
From:   Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc:     netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, marcelo.leitner@...il.com,
        jiri@...nulli.us, wenxu@...oud.cn, saeedm@...lanox.com,
        paulb@...lanox.com, gerlitz.or@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] flow_offload hardware priority fixes

Hi Jakub,

If the user specifies 'pref' in the new rule, then tc checks if there
is a tcf_proto object that matches this priority. If the tcf_proto
object does not exist, tc creates a tcf_proto object and it adds the
new rule to this tcf_proto.

In cls_flower, each tcf_proto only stores one single rule, so if the
user tries to add another rule with the same 'pref', cls_flower
returns EEXIST.

I'll prepare a new patchset not to map the priority to the netfilter
basechain priority, instead the rule priority will be internally
allocated for each new rule.

Thanks for your feedback.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ