netdev - Re: [PATCH V2] mlx5: Fix formats with line continuation whitespace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 02 Aug 2019 15:08:19 -0400
From:   Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
To:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        "joe@...ches.com" <joe@...ches.com>,
        "leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>
Cc:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mlx5: Fix formats with line continuation whitespace

On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 18:32 +0000, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 11:09 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-11-06 at 16:34 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2018-11-01 at 09:34 +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 12:24:08AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > > The line continuations unintentionally add whitespace so
> > > > > instead use coalesced formats to remove the whitespace.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > 
> > > > > v2: Remove excess space after %u
> > > > > 
> > > > >  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/rl.c | 6 ++----
> > > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
> > > 
> > > Applied, thanks.
> > 
> > Still not upstream.  How long does it take?
> > 
> 
> Doug, Leon, this patch still apply, let me know what happened here ?
> and if you want me to apply it to one of my branches.

I'm not entirely sure what happened here.  Obviously I said I had taken
it, which I don't do under my normal workflow until I've actually
applied and build tested the patch.  For it to not make it into the tree
means that I probably applied it to my wip/dl-for-next branch, but prior
to moving it to for-next, I might have had a rebase and it got lost in
the shuffle or something like that.  My apologies for letting it slip
through the cracks.  Anyway, I pulled the patch from patchworks, applied
it, and pushed it to k.o.

-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
    GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
    Fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B  1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)