[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190803060528.GA89737@archlinux-threadripper>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 23:05:28 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, andrew@...n.ch,
broonie@...nel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
f.fainelli@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
hkallweit1@...il.com, kernel-build-reports@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, lkp@...el.com, rdunlap@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mdio-octeon: Fix build error and Kconfig warning
On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 06:39:52PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 06:30:31PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 06:11:32PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > The proper way to fix this is to include either
> > >
> > > linux/io-64-nonatomic-hi-lo.h
> > >
> > > or
> > >
> > > linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h
> > >
> > > whichever is appropriate.
> >
> > Hmmmm, is that not what I did?
> >
> > Although I did not know about io-64-nonatomic-hi-lo.h. What is the
> > difference and which one is needed here?
>
> Whether you write the high or low 32 bits first. For this, it doesn't
> matter, since the compiled driver will never be run on real hardware.
That's what I figured. I have only seen lo-hi used personally, which is
what I went with here. Thanks for the confirmation!
>
> > There is apparently another failure when OF_MDIO is not set, I guess I
> > can try to look into that as well and respin into a series if
> > necessary.
>
> Thanks for taking care of that!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists