| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20190804214042.4564-2-jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2019 14:40:40 -0700
From: john.hubbard@...il.com
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>,
Yan Zheng <zyan@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 1/3] mm/gup: add make_dirty arg to put_user_pages_dirty_lock()
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Provide a more capable variation of put_user_pages_dirty_lock(),
and delete put_user_pages_dirty(). This is based on the
following:
1. Lots of call sites become simpler if a bool is passed
into put_user_page*(), instead of making the call site
choose which put_user_page*() variant to call.
2. Christoph Hellwig's observation that set_page_dirty_lock()
is usually correct, and set_page_dirty() is usually a
bug, or at least questionable, within a put_user_page*()
calling chain.
This leads to the following API choices:
* put_user_pages_dirty_lock(page, npages, make_dirty)
* There is no put_user_pages_dirty(). You have to
hand code that, in the rare case that it's
required.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c | 5 +-
drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_pages.c | 5 +-
drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_pages.c | 13 +--
drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c | 5 +-
drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c | 19 +---
include/linux/mm.h | 5 +-
mm/gup.c | 115 +++++++++------------
7 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c
index 08da840ed7ee..965cf9dea71a 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c
@@ -54,10 +54,7 @@ static void __ib_umem_release(struct ib_device *dev, struct ib_umem *umem, int d
for_each_sg_page(umem->sg_head.sgl, &sg_iter, umem->sg_nents, 0) {
page = sg_page_iter_page(&sg_iter);
- if (umem->writable && dirty)
- put_user_pages_dirty_lock(&page, 1);
- else
- put_user_page(page);
+ put_user_pages_dirty_lock(&page, 1, umem->writable && dirty);
}
sg_free_table(&umem->sg_head);
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_pages.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_pages.c
index b89a9b9aef7a..469acb961fbd 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_pages.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_pages.c
@@ -118,10 +118,7 @@ int hfi1_acquire_user_pages(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr, size_t np
void hfi1_release_user_pages(struct mm_struct *mm, struct page **p,
size_t npages, bool dirty)
{
- if (dirty)
- put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, npages);
- else
- put_user_pages(p, npages);
+ put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, npages, dirty);
if (mm) { /* during close after signal, mm can be NULL */
atomic64_sub(npages, &mm->pinned_vm);
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_pages.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_pages.c
index bfbfbb7e0ff4..26c1fb8d45cc 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_pages.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_pages.c
@@ -37,15 +37,6 @@
#include "qib.h"
-static void __qib_release_user_pages(struct page **p, size_t num_pages,
- int dirty)
-{
- if (dirty)
- put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, num_pages);
- else
- put_user_pages(p, num_pages);
-}
-
/**
* qib_map_page - a safety wrapper around pci_map_page()
*
@@ -124,7 +115,7 @@ int qib_get_user_pages(unsigned long start_page, size_t num_pages,
return 0;
bail_release:
- __qib_release_user_pages(p, got, 0);
+ put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, got, false);
bail:
atomic64_sub(num_pages, ¤t->mm->pinned_vm);
return ret;
@@ -132,7 +123,7 @@ int qib_get_user_pages(unsigned long start_page, size_t num_pages,
void qib_release_user_pages(struct page **p, size_t num_pages)
{
- __qib_release_user_pages(p, num_pages, 1);
+ put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, num_pages, true);
/* during close after signal, mm can be NULL */
if (current->mm)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c
index 0b0237d41613..62e6ffa9ad78 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c
@@ -75,10 +75,7 @@ static void usnic_uiom_put_pages(struct list_head *chunk_list, int dirty)
for_each_sg(chunk->page_list, sg, chunk->nents, i) {
page = sg_page(sg);
pa = sg_phys(sg);
- if (dirty)
- put_user_pages_dirty_lock(&page, 1);
- else
- put_user_page(page);
+ put_user_pages_dirty_lock(&page, 1, dirty);
usnic_dbg("pa: %pa\n", &pa);
}
kfree(chunk);
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c
index 67171c82b0c4..1e197753bf2f 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c
@@ -60,20 +60,6 @@ struct siw_mem *siw_mem_id2obj(struct siw_device *sdev, int stag_index)
return NULL;
}
-static void siw_free_plist(struct siw_page_chunk *chunk, int num_pages,
- bool dirty)
-{
- struct page **p = chunk->plist;
-
- while (num_pages--) {
- if (!PageDirty(*p) && dirty)
- put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, 1);
- else
- put_user_page(*p);
- p++;
- }
-}
-
void siw_umem_release(struct siw_umem *umem, bool dirty)
{
struct mm_struct *mm_s = umem->owning_mm;
@@ -82,8 +68,9 @@ void siw_umem_release(struct siw_umem *umem, bool dirty)
for (i = 0; num_pages; i++) {
int to_free = min_t(int, PAGES_PER_CHUNK, num_pages);
- siw_free_plist(&umem->page_chunk[i], to_free,
- umem->writable && dirty);
+ put_user_pages_dirty_lock(umem->page_chunk[i].plist,
+ to_free,
+ umem->writable && dirty);
kfree(umem->page_chunk[i].plist);
num_pages -= to_free;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 0334ca97c584..9759b6a24420 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1057,8 +1057,9 @@ static inline void put_user_page(struct page *page)
put_page(page);
}
-void put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages);
-void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages);
+void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages,
+ bool make_dirty);
+
void put_user_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages);
#if defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM) && !defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP)
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index 98f13ab37bac..7fefd7ab02c4 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -29,85 +29,70 @@ struct follow_page_context {
unsigned int page_mask;
};
-typedef int (*set_dirty_func_t)(struct page *page);
-
-static void __put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages,
- unsigned long npages,
- set_dirty_func_t sdf)
-{
- unsigned long index;
-
- for (index = 0; index < npages; index++) {
- struct page *page = compound_head(pages[index]);
-
- /*
- * Checking PageDirty at this point may race with
- * clear_page_dirty_for_io(), but that's OK. Two key cases:
- *
- * 1) This code sees the page as already dirty, so it skips
- * the call to sdf(). That could happen because
- * clear_page_dirty_for_io() called page_mkclean(),
- * followed by set_page_dirty(). However, now the page is
- * going to get written back, which meets the original
- * intention of setting it dirty, so all is well:
- * clear_page_dirty_for_io() goes on to call
- * TestClearPageDirty(), and write the page back.
- *
- * 2) This code sees the page as clean, so it calls sdf().
- * The page stays dirty, despite being written back, so it
- * gets written back again in the next writeback cycle.
- * This is harmless.
- */
- if (!PageDirty(page))
- sdf(page);
-
- put_user_page(page);
- }
-}
-
/**
- * put_user_pages_dirty() - release and dirty an array of gup-pinned pages
- * @pages: array of pages to be marked dirty and released.
+ * put_user_pages_dirty_lock() - release and optionally dirty gup-pinned pages
+ * @pages: array of pages to be maybe marked dirty, and definitely released.
* @npages: number of pages in the @pages array.
+ * @make_dirty: whether to mark the pages dirty
*
* "gup-pinned page" refers to a page that has had one of the get_user_pages()
* variants called on that page.
*
* For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a
- * compound page) dirty, if it was previously listed as clean. Then, release
- * the page using put_user_page().
+ * compound page) dirty, if @make_dirty is true, and if the page was previously
+ * listed as clean. In any case, releases all pages using put_user_page(),
+ * possibly via put_user_pages(), for the non-dirty case.
*
* Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details.
*
- * set_page_dirty(), which does not lock the page, is used here.
- * Therefore, it is the caller's responsibility to ensure that this is
- * safe. If not, then put_user_pages_dirty_lock() should be called instead.
+ * set_page_dirty_lock() is used internally. If instead, set_page_dirty() is
+ * required, then the caller should a) verify that this is really correct,
+ * because _lock() is usually required, and b) hand code it:
+ * set_page_dirty_lock(), put_user_page().
*
*/
-void put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages)
+void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages,
+ bool make_dirty)
{
- __put_user_pages_dirty(pages, npages, set_page_dirty);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages_dirty);
+ unsigned long index;
-/**
- * put_user_pages_dirty_lock() - release and dirty an array of gup-pinned pages
- * @pages: array of pages to be marked dirty and released.
- * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array.
- *
- * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a
- * compound page) dirty, if it was previously listed as clean. Then, release
- * the page using put_user_page().
- *
- * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details.
- *
- * This is just like put_user_pages_dirty(), except that it invokes
- * set_page_dirty_lock(), instead of set_page_dirty().
- *
- */
-void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages)
-{
- __put_user_pages_dirty(pages, npages, set_page_dirty_lock);
+ /*
+ * TODO: this can be optimized for huge pages: if a series of pages is
+ * physically contiguous and part of the same compound page, then a
+ * single operation to the head page should suffice.
+ */
+
+ if (!make_dirty) {
+ put_user_pages(pages, npages);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ for (index = 0; index < npages; index++) {
+ struct page *page = compound_head(pages[index]);
+ /*
+ * Checking PageDirty at this point may race with
+ * clear_page_dirty_for_io(), but that's OK. Two key
+ * cases:
+ *
+ * 1) This code sees the page as already dirty, so it
+ * skips the call to set_page_dirty(). That could happen
+ * because clear_page_dirty_for_io() called
+ * page_mkclean(), followed by set_page_dirty().
+ * However, now the page is going to get written back,
+ * which meets the original intention of setting it
+ * dirty, so all is well: clear_page_dirty_for_io() goes
+ * on to call TestClearPageDirty(), and write the page
+ * back.
+ *
+ * 2) This code sees the page as clean, so it calls
+ * set_page_dirty(). The page stays dirty, despite being
+ * written back, so it gets written back again in the
+ * next writeback cycle. This is harmless.
+ */
+ if (!PageDirty(page))
+ set_page_dirty_lock(page);
+ put_user_page(page);
+ }
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages_dirty_lock);
--
2.22.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists