netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] ixgbe: sync the first fragment unconditionally

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190806.113640.171591509807004446.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 06 Aug 2019 11:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     firo.yang@...e.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
        intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ixgbe: sync the first fragment unconditionally

From: Firo Yang <firo.yang@...e.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 09:29:51 +0000

> In Xen environment, if Xen-swiotlb is enabled, ixgbe driver
> could possibly allocate a page, DMA memory buffer, for the first
> fragment which is not suitable for Xen-swiotlb to do DMA operations.
> Xen-swiotlb will internally allocate another page for doing DMA
> operations. It requires syncing between those two pages. Otherwise,
> we may get an incomplete skb. To fix this problem, sync the first
> fragment no matter the first fargment is makred as "page_released"
> or not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Firo Yang <firo.yang@...e.com>

I don't understand, an unmap operation implies a sync operation.