lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190805174618.2b3b551a@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Aug 2019 17:46:18 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     Jiangfeng Xiao <xiaojiangfeng@...wei.com>
Cc:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>,
        <salil.mehta@...wei.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <leeyou.li@...wei.com>,
        <xiaowei774@...wei.com>, <nixiaoming@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] net: hisilicon: make hip04_tx_reclaim
 non-reentrant

On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 20:31:39 +0800, Jiangfeng Xiao wrote:
> If hip04_tx_reclaim is interrupted while it is running
> and then __napi_schedule continues to execute
> hip04_rx_poll->hip04_tx_reclaim, reentrancy occurs
> and oops is generated. So you need to mask the interrupt
> during the hip04_tx_reclaim run.

Napi poll method for the same napi instance can't be run concurrently.
Could you explain a little more what happens here?

Also looking at hip04_rx_poll() I don't think the interrupt re-enabling
logic guarantees the interrupt is not armed when NAPI is scheduled.
Please note that NAPI is no longer scheduled if napi_complete_done()
returned false.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ