netdev - [PATCH net-next 05/10] drop_monitor: Add alert mode operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190807103059.15270-6-idosch@idosch.org>
Date:   Wed,  7 Aug 2019 13:30:54 +0300
From:   Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, nhorman@...driver.com, jiri@...lanox.com,
        toke@...hat.com, dsahern@...il.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
        nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com,
        andy@...yhouse.net, f.fainelli@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        vivien.didelot@...il.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 05/10] drop_monitor: Add alert mode operations

From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>

The next patch is going to add another alert mode in which the dropped
packet is notified to user space, instead of only a summary of recent
drops.

Abstract the differences between the modes by adding alert mode
operations. The operations are selected based on the currently
configured mode and associated with the probes and the work item just
before tracing starts.

Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
---
 include/uapi/linux/net_dropmon.h |  9 ++++++++
 net/core/drop_monitor.c          | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/net_dropmon.h b/include/uapi/linux/net_dropmon.h
index 5edbd0a675fd..0fecdedeb6ca 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/net_dropmon.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/net_dropmon.h
@@ -62,4 +62,13 @@ enum {
  * Our group identifiers
  */
 #define NET_DM_GRP_ALERT 1
+
+/**
+ * enum net_dm_alert_mode - Alert mode.
+ * @NET_DM_ALERT_MODE_SUMMARY: A summary of recent drops is sent to user space.
+ */
+enum net_dm_alert_mode {
+	NET_DM_ALERT_MODE_SUMMARY,
+};
+
 #endif
diff --git a/net/core/drop_monitor.c b/net/core/drop_monitor.c
index cd2f3069f34e..9cd2f662cb9e 100644
--- a/net/core/drop_monitor.c
+++ b/net/core/drop_monitor.c
@@ -75,6 +75,16 @@ static int dm_delay = 1;
 static unsigned long dm_hw_check_delta = 2*HZ;
 static LIST_HEAD(hw_stats_list);
 
+static enum net_dm_alert_mode net_dm_alert_mode = NET_DM_ALERT_MODE_SUMMARY;
+
+struct net_dm_alert_ops {
+	void (*kfree_skb_probe)(void *ignore, struct sk_buff *skb,
+				void *location);
+	void (*napi_poll_probe)(void *ignore, struct napi_struct *napi,
+				int work, int budget);
+	void (*work_item_func)(struct work_struct *work);
+};
+
 static struct sk_buff *reset_per_cpu_data(struct per_cpu_dm_data *data)
 {
 	size_t al;
@@ -241,10 +251,23 @@ static void trace_napi_poll_hit(void *ignore, struct napi_struct *napi,
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
+static const struct net_dm_alert_ops net_dm_alert_summary_ops = {
+	.kfree_skb_probe	= trace_kfree_skb_hit,
+	.napi_poll_probe	= trace_napi_poll_hit,
+	.work_item_func		= send_dm_alert,
+};
+
+static const struct net_dm_alert_ops *net_dm_alert_ops_arr[] = {
+	[NET_DM_ALERT_MODE_SUMMARY]	= &net_dm_alert_summary_ops,
+};
+
 static int net_dm_trace_on_set(struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
 {
+	const struct net_dm_alert_ops *ops;
 	int cpu, rc;
 
+	ops = net_dm_alert_ops_arr[net_dm_alert_mode];
+
 	if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE)) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed to take reference on module");
 		return -ENODEV;
@@ -254,7 +277,7 @@ static int net_dm_trace_on_set(struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
 		struct per_cpu_dm_data *data = &per_cpu(dm_cpu_data, cpu);
 		struct sk_buff *skb;
 
-		INIT_WORK(&data->dm_alert_work, send_dm_alert);
+		INIT_WORK(&data->dm_alert_work, ops->work_item_func);
 		timer_setup(&data->send_timer, sched_send_work, 0);
 		/* Allocate a new per-CPU skb for the summary alert message and
 		 * free the old one which might contain stale data from
@@ -264,13 +287,13 @@ static int net_dm_trace_on_set(struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
 		consume_skb(skb);
 	}
 
-	rc = register_trace_kfree_skb(trace_kfree_skb_hit, NULL);
+	rc = register_trace_kfree_skb(ops->kfree_skb_probe, NULL);
 	if (rc) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed to connect probe to kfree_skb() tracepoint");
 		goto err_module_put;
 	}
 
-	rc = register_trace_napi_poll(trace_napi_poll_hit, NULL);
+	rc = register_trace_napi_poll(ops->napi_poll_probe, NULL);
 	if (rc) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed to connect probe to napi_poll() tracepoint");
 		goto err_unregister_trace;
@@ -279,7 +302,7 @@ static int net_dm_trace_on_set(struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
 	return 0;
 
 err_unregister_trace:
-	unregister_trace_kfree_skb(trace_kfree_skb_hit, NULL);
+	unregister_trace_kfree_skb(ops->kfree_skb_probe, NULL);
 err_module_put:
 	module_put(THIS_MODULE);
 	return rc;
@@ -288,10 +311,13 @@ static int net_dm_trace_on_set(struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
 static void net_dm_trace_off_set(void)
 {
 	struct dm_hw_stat_delta *new_stat, *temp;
+	const struct net_dm_alert_ops *ops;
 	int cpu;
 
-	unregister_trace_napi_poll(trace_napi_poll_hit, NULL);
-	unregister_trace_kfree_skb(trace_kfree_skb_hit, NULL);
+	ops = net_dm_alert_ops_arr[net_dm_alert_mode];
+
+	unregister_trace_napi_poll(ops->napi_poll_probe, NULL);
+	unregister_trace_kfree_skb(ops->kfree_skb_probe, NULL);
 
 	tracepoint_synchronize_unregister();
 
-- 
2.21.0