[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 11:43:25 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
Cc: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciejromanfijalkowski@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
nic_swsd <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] r8152: change rx_frag_head_sz and
rx_max_agg_num dynamically
On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 12:16:50 +0000, Hayes Wang wrote:
> Maciej Fijalkowski [mailto:maciejromanfijalkowski@...il.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2019 7:50 PM
> > > Excuse me again.
> > > I find the kernel supports the copybreak of Ethtool.
> > > However, I couldn't find a command of Ethtool to use it.
> >
> > Ummm there's set_tunable ops. Amazon's ena driver is making use of it from
> > what
> > I see. Look at ena_set_tunable() in
> > drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_ethtool.c.
>
> The kernel could support it. And I has finished it.
> However, when I want to test it by ethtool, I couldn't find suitable command.
> I couldn't find relative feature in the source code of ethtool, either.
It's possible it's not implemented in the user space tool 🤔
Looks like it got posted here:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg299877.html
But perhaps never finished?
It should be fairly straightforward to implement by looking at how
phy-tunables are handled.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists