lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 08 Aug 2019 10:10:45 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Cc:     Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>,
        Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix non-kerneldoc comment in realtek/rtlwifi/usb.c

Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net> writes:

> On 8/7/19 8:51 PM, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
>> Fix spurious warning message when building with W=1:
>>
>>    CC [M]  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/usb.o
>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/usb.c:243: warning: Cannot understand  * on line 243 - I thought it was a doc line
>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/usb.c:760: warning: Cannot understand  * on line 760 - I thought it was a doc line
>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/usb.c:790: warning: Cannot understand  * on line 790 - I thought it was a doc line
>>
>> Clean up the comment format.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
>>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:  Larry Finger pointed out the patch wasn't checkpatch-clean.
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/usb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/usb.c
>> index 34d68dbf4b4c..4b59f3b46b28 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/usb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/usb.c
>> @@ -239,10 +239,7 @@ static void _rtl_usb_io_handler_release(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
>>   	mutex_destroy(&rtlpriv->io.bb_mutex);
>>   }
>>   -/**
>> - *
>> - *	Default aggregation handler. Do nothing and just return the oldest skb.
>> - */
>> +/*	Default aggregation handler. Do nothing and just return the oldest skb.  */
>>   static struct sk_buff *_none_usb_tx_aggregate_hdl(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
>>   						  struct sk_buff_head *list)
>>   {
>> @@ -756,11 +753,6 @@ static int rtl_usb_start(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
>>   	return err;
>>   }
>>   -/**
>> - *
>> - *
>> - */
>> -
>>   /*=======================  tx =========================================*/
>>   static void rtl_usb_cleanup(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
>>   {
>> @@ -786,11 +778,7 @@ static void rtl_usb_cleanup(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
>>   	usb_kill_anchored_urbs(&rtlusb->tx_submitted);
>>   }
>>   -/**
>> - *
>> - * We may add some struct into struct rtl_usb later. Do deinit here.
>> - *
>> - */
>> +/* We may add some struct into struct rtl_usb later. Do deinit here.  */
>>   static void rtl_usb_deinit(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
>>   {
>>   	rtl_usb_cleanup(hw);
>
> I missed that the subject line should be "rtwifi: Fix ....". Otherwise it is OK.

I can fix the subject during commit.

-- 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ