netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 00/10] drop_monitor: Capture dropped packets and metadata

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 9 Aug 2019 15:38:00 +0300
From:   Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, nhorman@...driver.com,
        jiri@...lanox.com, toke@...hat.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
        nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com,
        andy@...yhouse.net, f.fainelli@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        vivien.didelot@...il.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/10] drop_monitor: Capture dropped packets and
 metadata

On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 03:08:25PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On top of your dropwatch changes I added the ability to print the
> payload as hex. e.g.,
> 
> Issue Ctrl-C to stop monitoring
> drop at: nf_hook_slow+0x59/0x98 (0xffffffff814ec532)
> input port ifindex: 1
> timestamp: Thu Aug  8 15:04:02 2019 360015026 nsec
> length: 64
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 08 00 45 00      ........ ......E.
> 00 3c e7 50 40 00 40 06  55 69 7f 00 00 01 7f 00      .<.P@.@. Ui......
> 00 01 80 2c 30 39 74 b9  c7 4d 00 00 00 00 a0 02      ...,09t. .M......
> ff d7 fe 30 00 00 02 04  ff d7 04 02 08 0a 53 79       ...0.... ......Sy
> original length: 74

Nice! I'll Cc you on my pull request so that you could submit your
changes afterwards.

> Seems like the skb protocol is also needed to properly parse the payload
> - ie., to know it is an ethernet header, followed by ip and tcp.

Yes, you're right. Will add this in v2.

Thanks, David.