[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190809162336.GB8016@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 12:23:36 -0400
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, f.fainelli@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
davem@...emloft.net, linville@...hat.com, cphealy@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH ethtool] ethtool: dump nested registers
On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 03:34:54PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Usually kernel drivers set the regs->len value to the same length as
> info->regdump_len, which was used for the allocation. In case where
> regs->len is smaller than the allocated info->regdump_len length,
> we may assume that the dump contains a nested set of registers.
>
> This becomes handy for kernel drivers to expose registers of an
> underlying network conduit unfortunately not exposed to userspace,
> as found in network switching equipment for example.
>
> This patch adds support for recursing into the dump operation if there
> is enough room for a nested ethtool_drvinfo structure containing a
> valid driver name, followed by a ethtool_regs structure like this:
>
> 0 regs->len info->regdump_len
> v v v
> +--------------+-----------------+--------------+-- - --+
> | ethtool_regs | ethtool_drvinfo | ethtool_regs | |
> +--------------+-----------------+--------------+-- - --+
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
I wasn't sure what to do with this one, given the disucssion that
followed. But since Dave merged "net: dsa: dump CPU port regs through
master" for net-next, I went ahead and queued this one for the next
release. If that was the wrong thing to do, speak-up now!
Thanks,
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@...driver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists