netdev - AW: tcan4x5x on a Raspberry Pi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ee351bd74b764759bb0258af3651bd4a@escrypt.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Aug 2019 16:46:43 +0000
From:   "FIXED-TERM Buecheler Konstantin (ETAS-SEC/ECT-Mu)" 
        <fixed-term.Konstantin.Buecheler@...rypt.com>
To:     Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
        "linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: AW: tcan4x5x on a Raspberry Pi


> Konstantin

>> On 7/29/19 6:19 AM, FIXED-TERM Buecheler Konstantin (ETAS-SEC/ECT-Mu) wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am currently working on a project where I am trying to use the tcan4550 chip with a Raspberry PI 3B.
>> I am struggling to create a working device tree overlay file for the Raspberry Pi.
>> Has anyone here tried this already? I would appreciate any help.

> Are you using the driver from net-next?

> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/tree/drivers/net/can/m_can

Yes, I am using the driver from net-next. 


> DT documentation here

> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt

I saw this documentation but it didn’t help much (As I said, I don’t have much experience with device trees) . My dts file currently looks like this:  

/dts-v1/;
/plugin/;

/ {
    compatible = "brcm,bcm2835", "brcm,bcm2836", "brcm,bcm2708", "brcm,bcm2709";
    fragment@0 {
        target = <&spi0>;
	__overlay__ {
            status = "okay";
	    spidev@0{
	        status = "disabled";
	    };
	};
    };

    fragment@2 {
        compatible = "bosch, m_can";
	target = <&spi0>;
	__overlay__ {
	    tcan4x5x: tcan4x5x@0 {
	             compatible = "ti,tcan4x5x";
                          reg = <0>;
		#address-cells = <1>;
                         #size-cells = <1>;
		spi-max-frequency = <10000000>;
                         bosch,mram-cfg = <0x0 0 0 32 0 0 1 1>;
		data-ready-gpios = <&gpio 23 0>;
		device-wake-gpios = <&gpio 24 1>;
				
	    };		
	};
    };
};


Checking dmesg I always see these errors:
[    5.409051] tcan4x5x spi0.0: no clock found
[    5.409064] tcan4x5x spi0.0: no CAN clock source defined
[    5.409125] tcan4x5x spi0.0: data-ready gpio not defined
[    5.409135] tcan4x5x spi0.0: Probe failed, err=-22

I already fixed the clock issue once by doing something like this:
clocks = <&can0_osc>,
              <&can0_osc>;
clock-names = "hclk", "cclk";
But that didn’t fix the " data-ready gpio not defined" error.


> I did the development on a BeagleBone Black.

> Dan

> Thanks,
> Konstantin
>