[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM0PR04MB4994C1A8F32FB6C9A7EE057E94D60@AM0PR04MB4994.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 17:14:50 +0000
From: Ioana Ciocoi Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@....com>
To: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com" <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/3] net: batched receive in GRO path
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org <netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org> On
> Behalf Of Edward Cree
> Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2019 4:52 PM
> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>; Eric Dumazet
> <eric.dumazet@...il.com>; linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com
> Subject: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/3] net: batched receive in GRO path
>
> This series listifies part of GRO processing, in a manner which allows those
> packets which are not GROed (i.e. for which dev_gro_receive returns
> GRO_NORMAL) to be passed on to the listified regular receive path.
> dev_gro_receive() itself is not listified, nor the per-protocol GRO
> callback, since GRO's need to hold packets on lists under napi->gro_hash
> makes keeping the packets on other lists awkward, and since the GRO control
> block state of held skbs can refer only to one 'new' skb at a time.
> Instead, when napi_frags_finish() handles a GRO_NORMAL result, stash the skb
> onto a list in the napi struct, which is received at the end of the napi
> poll or when its length exceeds the (new) sysctl net.core.gro_normal_batch.
Hi Edward,
I'm probably missing a lot of context here, but is there a reason
this change targets only the napi_gro_frags() path and not the
napi_gro_receive() one?
I'm trying to understand what drivers that don't call napi_gro_frags()
should do in order to benefit from this batching feature.
Thanks,
Ioana
Powered by blists - more mailing lists