netdev - Re: [patch net-next] netdevsim: register couple of devlink params

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190809142635.52a6275d@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Aug 2019 14:26:35 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] netdevsim: register couple of devlink params

On Fri,  9 Aug 2019 13:05:12 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
> 
> Register couple of devlink params, one generic, one driver-specific.
> Make the values available over debugfs.
> 
> Example:
> $ echo "111" > /sys/bus/netdevsim/new_device
> $ devlink dev param
> netdevsim/netdevsim111:
>   name max_macs type generic
>     values:
>       cmode driverinit value 32
>   name test1 type driver-specific
>     values:
>       cmode driverinit value true
> $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/netdevsim/netdevsim111/max_macs
> 32
> $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/netdevsim/netdevsim111/test1
> Y
> $ devlink dev param set netdevsim/netdevsim111 name max_macs cmode driverinit value 16
> $ devlink dev param set netdevsim/netdevsim111 name test1 cmode driverinit value false
> $ devlink dev reload netdevsim/netdevsim111
> $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/netdevsim/netdevsim111/max_macs
> 16
> $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/netdevsim/netdevsim111/test1
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>

The netdevsim patch looks good, what's the plan for tests?

We don't need much perhaps what you have in the commit message 
as a script which can be run by automated bots would be sufficient?