[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190811033910.GL30120@lunn.ch>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 05:39:10 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Marek BehĂșn <marek.behun@....cz>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: dsa: fix fixed-link port
registration
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 05:18:57AM +0200, Marek BehĂșn wrote:
> Commit 88d6272acaaa ("net: phy: avoid unneeded MDIO reads in
> genphy_read_status") broke fixed link DSA port registration in
> dsa_port_fixed_link_register_of: the genphy_read_status does not do what
> it is supposed to and the following adjust_link is given wrong
> parameters.
Hi Marek
Which parameters are incorrect?
In fixed_phy.c, __fixed_phy_register() there is:
/* propagate the fixed link values to struct phy_device */
phy->link = status->link;
if (status->link) {
phy->speed = status->speed;
phy->duplex = status->duplex;
phy->pause = status->pause;
phy->asym_pause = status->asym_pause;
}
Are we not initialising something? Or is the initialisation done here
getting reset sometime afterwards?
Thanks
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists