[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91cd70df-c856-4c7e-7ebb-c01519fb13d2@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 13:35:20 +0200
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Marek BehĂșn <marek.behun@....cz>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: dsa: fix fixed-link port
registration
On 11.08.2019 05:39, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 05:18:57AM +0200, Marek BehĂșn wrote:
>> Commit 88d6272acaaa ("net: phy: avoid unneeded MDIO reads in
>> genphy_read_status") broke fixed link DSA port registration in
>> dsa_port_fixed_link_register_of: the genphy_read_status does not do what
>> it is supposed to and the following adjust_link is given wrong
>> parameters.
>
> Hi Marek
>
> Which parameters are incorrect?
>
> In fixed_phy.c, __fixed_phy_register() there is:
>
> /* propagate the fixed link values to struct phy_device */
> phy->link = status->link;
> if (status->link) {
> phy->speed = status->speed;
> phy->duplex = status->duplex;
> phy->pause = status->pause;
> phy->asym_pause = status->asym_pause;
> }
>
> Are we not initialising something? Or is the initialisation done here
> getting reset sometime afterwards?
>
In addition to Andrew's question:
We talk about this DT config: armada-385-turris-omnia.dts ?
Which kernel version are you using?
> Thanks
> Andrew
>
Heiner
Powered by blists - more mailing lists