[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190811.204918.777837587917672157.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 20:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dsahern@...il.com
Cc: liuhangbin@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, sbrivio@...hat.com,
mleitner@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv4/route: do not check saddr dev if iif is
LOOPBACK_IFINDEX
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 22:16:00 -0600
> On 8/1/19 10:13 PM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 01:51:25PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
>>> On 8/1/19 2:29 AM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
>>>> Jianlin reported a bug that for IPv4, ip route get from src_addr would fail
>>>> if src_addr is not an address on local system.
>>>>
>>>> \# ip route get 1.1.1.1 from 2.2.2.2
>>>> RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
>>>
>>> so this is a forwarding lookup in which case iif should be set. Based on
>>
>> with out setting iif in userspace, the kernel set iif to lo by default.
>
> right, it presumes locally generated traffic.
>>
>>> the above 'route get' inet_rtm_getroute is doing a lookup as if it is
>>> locally generated traffic.
>>
>> yeah... but what about the IPv6 part. That cause a different behavior in
>> userspace.
>
> just one of many, many annoying differences between v4 and v6. We could
> try to catalog it.
I think we just have to accept this difference because this change would
change behavior for all route lookups, not just those done by ip route get.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists