[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <55b2fe3e5123958ccd7983e0892bc604aa717132.1565614152.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 20:49:12 +0800
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] sctp: fix the transport error_count check
As the annotation says in sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike():
"If the transport error count is greater than the pf_retrans
threshold, and less than pathmaxrtx ..."
It should be transport->error_count checked with pathmaxrxt,
instead of asoc->pf_retrans.
Fixes: 5aa93bcf66f4 ("sctp: Implement quick failover draft from tsvwg")
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
---
net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
index a554d6d..1cf5bb5 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ static void sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike(struct sctp_cmd_seq *commands,
*/
if (net->sctp.pf_enable &&
(transport->state == SCTP_ACTIVE) &&
- (asoc->pf_retrans < transport->pathmaxrxt) &&
+ (transport->error_count < transport->pathmaxrxt) &&
(transport->error_count > asoc->pf_retrans)) {
sctp_assoc_control_transport(asoc, transport,
--
2.1.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists