[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190812131137.74a4ddf3@coco.lan>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 13:11:37 -0300
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
xdp-newbies@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Documentation: sphinx: Don't parse socket() as
identifier reference
Em Mon, 12 Aug 2019 18:07:05 +0200
Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net> escreveu:
> With the introduction of Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py, socket() is
> parsed as a reference to the in-kernel definition of socket. Sphinx then
> decides that struct socket is a good match, which is usually not
> intended, when the syscall is meant instead. This was observed in
> Documentation/networking/af_xdp.rst.
>
> Prevent socket() from being misinterpreted by adding it to the Skipfuncs
> list in automarkup.py.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
> ---
>
> v2:
> - block socket() in Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py, as suggested by
> Jonathan Corbet
>
> v1:
> - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190810121738.19587-1-j.neuschaefer@gmx.net/
> ---
> Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py b/Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py
> index a8798369e8f7..5b6119ff69f4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py
> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py
> @@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ RE_function = re.compile(r'([\w_][\w\d_]+\(\))')
> # just don't even try with these names.
> #
> Skipfuncs = [ 'open', 'close', 'read', 'write', 'fcntl', 'mmap',
> - 'select', 'poll', 'fork', 'execve', 'clone', 'ioctl']
> + 'select', 'poll', 'fork', 'execve', 'clone', 'ioctl',
> + 'socket' ]
Both patches sound OK on my eyes. Yet, I would just fold them into
a single one.
In any case:
Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
>
> #
> # Find all occurrences of function() and try to replace them with
> --
> 2.20.1
>
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists