[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190813095529.aisgjjwl6rzt5xeh@salvia>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 11:55:29 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Jeremy Sowden <jeremy@...zel.net>
Cc: Netfilter Devel <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Net Dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/8] netfilter: header compilation fixes
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 03:16:57PM +0100, Jeremy Sowden wrote:
> A number of netfilter header files are on the header-test blacklist
> becuse they cannot be compiled stand-alone. There are two main reasons
> for this: missing inclusions of other headers, and missing conditionals
> checking for CONFIG_* symbols.
>
> The first six of these patches rectify these omissions, the seventh
> removes some unnecessary "#ifdef __KERNEL__" checks, and the last
> removes all the NF headers from the blacklist.
>
> I've cc'ed Masahiro Yamada because the last patch removes 74 lines from
> include/Kbuild and may conflict with his kbuild tree.
Series applied, one comment below.
> Jeremy Sowden (8):
> netfilter: inlined four headers files into another one.
> netfilter: added missing includes to a number of header-files.
> netfilter: added missing IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER) checks to
> header-file.
> netfilter: added missing IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_TABLES) check to
> header-file.
> netfilter: added missing IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK) checks to
> some header-files.
> netfilter: added missing IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NETFILTER) checks to some
> header-files.
> netfilter: removed "#ifdef __KERNEL__" guards from some headers.
> kbuild: removed all netfilter headers from header-test blacklist.
Would you mind if - before pushing this out - I do this string
replacement for the patch subject?
s/added/add
s/removed/remove
s/inlined/inline
I was told present tense is preferred for description. Otherwise, I'll
leave them as is.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists