[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e0397d30-7405-a7af-286c-fe76887caf0a@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 11:20:57 -0700
From: Gerd Rausch <gerd.rausch@...cle.com>
To: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
rds-devel@....oracle.com
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/5] RDS: Re-add pf/sol access via sysctl
From: Andy Grover <andy.grover@...cle.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:35:51 -0800
Although RDS has an official PF_RDS value now, existing software
expects to look for rds sysctls to determine it. We need to maintain
these for now, for backwards compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Andy Grover <andy.grover@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Gerd Rausch <gerd.rausch@...cle.com>
---
net/rds/sysctl.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/rds/sysctl.c b/net/rds/sysctl.c
index e381bbcd9cc1..9760292a0af4 100644
--- a/net/rds/sysctl.c
+++ b/net/rds/sysctl.c
@@ -49,6 +49,13 @@ unsigned int rds_sysctl_max_unacked_bytes = (16 << 20);
unsigned int rds_sysctl_ping_enable = 1;
+/*
+ * We have official values, but must maintain the sysctl interface for existing
+ * software that expects to find these values here.
+ */
+static int rds_sysctl_pf_rds = PF_RDS;
+static int rds_sysctl_sol_rds = SOL_RDS;
+
static struct ctl_table rds_sysctl_rds_table[] = {
{
.procname = "reconnect_min_delay_ms",
@@ -68,6 +75,20 @@ static struct ctl_table rds_sysctl_rds_table[] = {
.extra1 = &rds_sysctl_reconnect_min_jiffies,
.extra2 = &rds_sysctl_reconnect_max,
},
+ {
+ .procname = "pf_rds",
+ .data = &rds_sysctl_pf_rds,
+ .maxlen = sizeof(int),
+ .mode = 0444,
+ .proc_handler = &proc_dointvec,
+ },
+ {
+ .procname = "sol_rds",
+ .data = &rds_sysctl_sol_rds,
+ .maxlen = sizeof(int),
+ .mode = 0444,
+ .proc_handler = &proc_dointvec,
+ },
{
.procname = "max_unacked_packets",
.data = &rds_sysctl_max_unacked_packets,
--
2.22.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists