| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <43ed59db-9228-9132-b9a5-31c8d1e8e9e9@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 02:55:42 +0300
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>,
Patrick Ruddy <pruddy@...tta.att-mail.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
linus.luessing@...3.blue
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] mcast: ensure L-L IPv6 packets are accepted by
bridge
On 8/13/19 10:53 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> + Bridge maintainers, Linus
>
Good catch Ido, thanks!
First I'd say the subject needs to reflect that this is a bridge change
better, please rearrange it like so - bridge: mcast: ...
More below,
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 03:18:04PM +0100, Patrick Ruddy wrote:
>> At present only all-nodes IPv6 multicast packets are accepted by
>> a bridge interface that is not in multicast router mode. Since
>> other protocols can be running in the absense of multicast
>> forwarding e.g. OSPFv3 IPv6 ND. Change the test to allow
>> all of the FFx2::/16 range to be accepted when not in multicast
>> router mode. This aligns the code with IPv4 link-local reception
>> and RFC4291
>
> Can you please quote the relevant part from RFC 4291?
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Patrick Ruddy <pruddy@...tta.att-mail.com>
>> ---
>> include/net/addrconf.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
>> net/bridge/br_multicast.c | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/addrconf.h b/include/net/addrconf.h
>> index becdad576859..05b42867e969 100644
>> --- a/include/net/addrconf.h
>> +++ b/include/net/addrconf.h
>> @@ -434,6 +434,21 @@ static inline void addrconf_addr_solict_mult(const struct in6_addr *addr,
>> htonl(0xFF000000) | addr->s6_addr32[3]);
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * link local multicast address range ffx2::/16 rfc4291
>> + */
>> +static inline bool ipv6_addr_is_ll_mcast(const struct in6_addr *addr)
>> +{
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && BITS_PER_LONG == 64
>> + __be64 *p = (__be64 *)addr;
>> + return ((p[0] & cpu_to_be64(0xff0f000000000000UL))
>> + ^ cpu_to_be64(0xff02000000000000UL)) == 0UL;
>> +#else
>> + return ((addr->s6_addr32[0] & htonl(0xff0f0000)) ^
>> + htonl(0xff020000)) == 0;
>> +#endif
>> +}
>> +
>> static inline bool ipv6_addr_is_ll_all_nodes(const struct in6_addr *addr)
>> {
>> #if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && BITS_PER_LONG == 64
>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
>> index 9b379e110129..ed3957381fa2 100644
>> --- a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
>> @@ -1664,7 +1664,7 @@ static int br_multicast_ipv6_rcv(struct net_bridge *br,
>> err = ipv6_mc_check_mld(skb);
>>
>> if (err == -ENOMSG) {
>> - if (!ipv6_addr_is_ll_all_nodes(&ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr))
>> + if (!ipv6_addr_is_ll_mcast(&ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr))
>> BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->mrouters_only = 1;
>
> IIUC, you want IPv6 link-local packets to be locally received, but this
> also changes how these packets are flooded. RFC 4541 says that packets
Indeed, we'll start flooding them all, not just the all hosts address.
If that is at all required it'll definitely have to be optional.
> addressed to the all hosts address are a special case and should be
> forwarded to all ports:
>
> "In IPv6, the data forwarding rules are more straight forward because MLD is
> mandated for addresses with scope 2 (link-scope) or greater. The only exception
> is the address FF02::1 which is the all hosts link-scope address for which MLD
> messages are never sent. Packets with the all hosts link-scope address should
> be forwarded on all ports."
>
I wonder what is the problem for the host to join such group on behalf of the bridge ?
Then you'll receive the traffic at least locally and the RFC says it itself - MLD is mandated
for the other link-local addresses.
It's very late here and maybe I'm missing something.. :)
> Maybe you want something like:
>
I think we can do without the new field, either pass local_rcv into br_multicast_rcv() or
set it based on return value. The extra test will have to remain unfortunately, but we
can reduce the tests by one if carefully done.
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c
> index 09b1dd8cd853..9f312a73f61c 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c
> @@ -132,7 +132,8 @@ int br_handle_frame_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb
> if ((mdst || BR_INPUT_SKB_CB_MROUTERS_ONLY(skb)) &&
> br_multicast_querier_exists(br, eth_hdr(skb))) {
> if ((mdst && mdst->host_joined) ||
> - br_multicast_is_router(br)) {
> + br_multicast_is_router(br) ||
> + BR_INPUT_SKB_CB_LOCAL_RECEIVE(skb)) {
> local_rcv = true;
> br->dev->stats.multicast++;
> }
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
> index 9b379e110129..f03cecf6174e 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
> @@ -1667,6 +1667,9 @@ static int br_multicast_ipv6_rcv(struct net_bridge *br,
> if (!ipv6_addr_is_ll_all_nodes(&ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr))
> BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->mrouters_only = 1;
>
> + if (ipv6_addr_is_ll_mcast(&ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr))
> + BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->local_receive = 1;
> +
> if (ipv6_addr_is_all_snoopers(&ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr)) {
> err = br_ip6_multicast_mrd_rcv(br, port, skb);
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> index b7a4942ff1b3..d76394ca4059 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> @@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ struct br_input_skb_cb {
> #ifdef CONFIG_BRIDGE_IGMP_SNOOPING
> u8 igmp;
> u8 mrouters_only:1;
> + u8 local_receive:1;
> #endif
> u8 proxyarp_replied:1;
> u8 src_port_isolated:1;
> @@ -445,8 +446,10 @@ struct br_input_skb_cb {
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_BRIDGE_IGMP_SNOOPING
> # define BR_INPUT_SKB_CB_MROUTERS_ONLY(__skb) (BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(__skb)->mrouters_only)
> +# define BR_INPUT_SKB_CB_LOCAL_RECEIVE(__skb) (BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(__skb)->local_receive)
> #else
> # define BR_INPUT_SKB_CB_MROUTERS_ONLY(__skb) (0)
> +# define BR_INPUT_SKB_CB_LOCAL_RECEIVE(__skb) (0)
> #endif
>
> #define br_printk(level, br, format, args...) \
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists